In a world like SOS rules and regulations exist in two prongs:
I would suggest this echos human sociology. If you were to look at different civilizations in history, would this not be the case?…
As always, feel free to comment or edit in the wiki.
Governmental institutions reach only so deep. With the advent of the free market, the rise of the bourgeois, and the overbearingly explosive capitalistic society brings commerce to the forefront of societal policies. Where does the Culture of Customization fit in commerce? Does SOStopia have a free market system? In the open source software community, software survives based on its adaptability and effectiveness. The operating system Linux (built under like standards) exists as a cloud of little programs unlike its proprietorially friends, OSX and Windows who exist on computers as small groups of large programs. These aspects when branched through to society create the Culture of Customization aspect in commerce.
To Reiterate the first aspect of Society Open Source: The expressed freedom and ability to customize anything and everything for better performance and better pleasing aesthetics.
SOStopian companies other than the evil S Inc, exist in a system we would see as a free market at face value. These companies would exist so far as they were able to survive through their adaptability and effectiveness within the SOStopian society. Each company sits alongside many companies like it and unlike it. Looking deeper, the system cannot possibly be free market. There are no major companies in every field trying to take out smaller competitors, there are no excessively large trusts… You could argue this exists out of my having created SOStopia in ‘a perfect world.’ But alas, SOStopia is not perfect. If the system were free market, then S Inc could seriously branch out into the whole economy sucking up every little startup on its way. What’s to stop them?
Well, in this case the mentality of the SOStopians breaches the elusive walls of this supposed free market. The demand controls the market. SOStopians are individuals in the root sense of the world. They require the ability to customize their entire world around them. As silly (or hauntingly socialistic) as this may sound, the SOStopians use any means necessary to provide this ability for customization. They don’t suffice with the ability to choose or not to choose. They require multiple choice questions, always with the ability to write-in their preference if not listed.
If we were to implement this type of behavior in the world, what would it look like?
As always I’d like to hear all of your opinions on what could be done. “But Krijali how can I do that?” Well, I’m glad you asked. You could comment to this post, discuss this essay in the wiki, or even edit it in the wiki. SOS is all about the expression of the community. So, I hand off my pen.
The Free, Libre Open Source Software community cherishes its extensive ability to ownership on its own property. This expressed ownership is important. Why would anyone want other people to own their things? So our first HOWTO tip for all of you SOStopians is this; Break the DMCA. Mr Tulley says you should teach your kids how to do this, however I should stress you should simply to exercise your own right to ownership.
In a nutshell: buy a song from iTunes, burn it to a CD, re-import the song, and delete the original. You just broke the DMCA by stripping the song of its copyrights. Now doesn’t that make you feel a little more free? (To learn how to do this more in depth, feel free to check out the wiki page for this article.)
More specifically this breaks the DMCA because it takes the DRM off of the music track. The basis is that this enables you to then share the music file with others, spreading copyrighted material that you don’t own. Here though, the goal is to express that personal freedom. DRM’d music cannot play on all music players, and when music has DRM on it you can’t expressively say its yours. By taking the rights to your music, your freeing it in a sense.
SOStopians hate DRM. They feel it restricts their ability to use their media in the way they want to. You’d think SOStopia would then fall because (*dramatic pause*) they could share that music (or other media). That may be true to begin with. But if they were to only share music, the music industry would crumple. This doesn’t sound very good except if you were to look in the long run. After this, a new strategy would develop. Maybe the music industry would develop an incentive structure for music deployment, or simply amp up the importance of liver performances. What do you think?
I’d like to hear all of your opinions on what could be done. “But Krijali how can I do that?” Well, I’m glad you asked. You could comment to this post, discuss this essay in the wiki, or even edit it in the wiki. SOS is all about the expression of the community. So, I hand off my pen.
Hello and welcome to what will be the OpenSelf. Before I get started with actual posts I felt an introduction and grounding per say would be appropriate. I personally have always wanted an outlet to explain my take on life, but then have readers add their own comments and ideas to help further everyone’s understanding.
OpenSelf will contain mostly my alternative take on aspects in life including, but not limited to, the metaphysical, physical, pseudo physics (possibly including the quantum type), world religion, and other… well… just more simple things. I will sometimes have references and make these as scholarly as possible. Other times I will be speaking from my own experiences and mini not so scientific experiments/observations in life. (This is why others editing in the wiki will be really fun and interesting.)
OpenSelf is relative in the SOStopia world because self (yes little s self – we can all will apologize to the Atman later) actions inherently create the actions of the larger group (society). This is the Ah-Ha moment! To challenge Bonnie Tyler, who wants a hero to be larger than life, OpenSelf will explore that there is no limit to what defines life and sets the act of life in a confined set of invisible ‘rules’.
I must retire at the moment, but I look forward to sharing with you some (I trust) interesting thoughts and hearing your comments and discussion! As a closing thought, not to encroach on Stan Brakhage or other thinkers, but take a moment to look upon a situation with new eyes and remove the prepositioned labels we automatically give things, and see if you see thousands of shades of green in your field or none! More on this later.
When I download Firefox, I know the piece of software I’m about to use can be customized. I don’t mean simple interface colors and the like. I mean the ability to tinker with its behavior and completely change (decimate?) its aesthetics. The US Constitution works in the same way. One generation receives it from the generation before inheriting the ability to change or amend it. Just like my ability to make Firefox’ file menu read ‘l33t m3nu’, with enough help you could change the label ‘executive branch’ to ‘cute, furry government branch of doom.’
So goes the first aspect of Society Open Source: The expressed freedom and ability to customize anything and everything for better performance and better pleasing aesthetics.
In SOStopia, customization reigns foremost. The state’s foundation and laws express the ability to inherently change them, as per the will of the people (the sostopians). But not all is happy in SOStopia. Our little sostopians have issues with their largest corporation, S inc. Being SOStopia, they immediately begin rewriting laws to take down S inc. S inc thwarts these efforts; alas, the corporation employs many specialists with the sole job of law revision. The sostopians enrage over this.
Now the sostopians wouldn’t be in this dilemma if they hadn’t purchased S inc’s goods and services. So what options exist for the poor sostopians?
It’s true, having everything and anything expressively free for customization creates problems. With the ability to change the fundamental structure of one’s government, anarchy could ensue. I believe this problem exists only in the short term. Our little sostopians may have a problem with S inc, and they may not be able to write laws, and enforce them quick enough to bring about any improvement. However, there are other ways. Could they not boycott S inc’s products? Engage in civil disobedience? Even if it came to it, could they not forcibly bring about change? The freedom to tinker and customize leads to heightened problem solving. When you customize things, many times they break. But when they break, that encourages you to figure out how to make it better, a formidable step 2. The little sostopians see this as an opportunity to learn.
Where are the positives to such a culture of customization? Trust plays a key role. Such a culture would garnish and create trust. For an example in the technical world, look at wikipedia. If I wanted to, I could erase hundreds of pages within an hour. Although there are built in ways to correct this, that still requires the work of the community. If half of the wikipedia audience were to systematically erase the entire encyclopedia of information, it would be devastating. So why hasn’t this happened? I say it must be trust.
So how can you relate this to your own lives and community? There are countless ways to do so. I recommend making as much noise as possible to get as much information as possible from your heads of state.
I’d like to hear all of your opinions on what could be done. “But Krijali how can I do that?” Well, I’m glad you asked. You could comment to this post, discuss this essay in the wiki, or even edit it in the wiki. SOS is all about the expression of the community. So, I hand off my pen.
